🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". The policy could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to enact a proposal raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," stated one MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in strong research".

Earlier, interest grew behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation established by the relatives of a young person who was lost after viewing harmful online content suggests that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are secure and suitable for minors," stated a influential peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the state level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures mandating parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that states globally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.